BAWC Forums

what car is this for?

Damn, a 545hp celica. Any pics of the car?

Nice peak numbers.

Power delivery sucks though.

I'm assuming the RPM's are on the bottom...why are they off?

gaining 340 hp within 1000 rpms is such a rush LOL

Kinda hard to read it, but are those hp and torque curves, and if so why do they cross at 3 points, none of which are at 5252 rpm?

Weird graph. Besides not crossing at 5252, it's making more power than torque until 4500ish RPM.

really odd graph to say the least.

And an NA makes more power than he does all the way to 5k. Power under the curve > peak hp (thus why Supra's don't impress me)

I'd like to see those front tires between 4500 and 5500.

[quote=""CursedFish""]Weird graph. Besides not crossing at 5252, it's making more power than torque until 4500ish RPM.[/quote]

The torque and hp scales aren't the same, so it won't cross at 5250.

Remember, this is a 4 cylinder. What kind of power do you want it to make off of boost with low compression pistons?

What kind of power do you want it to make off of boost with low compression pistons?

Not much, but then, that's why we're not impressed with having all that power in a little 1800rpm band either

I'm the guy who wants to put a 3.8L block in my R/T for better low end torque. I'm definitely in the "no replacement for displacement" club.

why does it say torque flywheel? is it estimating the torque to the flywheel instead of to the wheels?

looks like it was on a dynapack dyno. They bolt to your wheel hubs and calculate flywheel numbers.