Let's try Ford now.

If you're looking for a place to direct your vehicular thoughts, you've found it.

Moderator: Monochrome

Post Reply
User avatar
Jeff V.
Posts: 25380
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:36 pm

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Jeff V. »

Yeah. Super low current stuff like the amplifier turn on signal. Still surprising to see. I don't think I've seen anything smaller than 20 gauge on the GM or Mitsu stuff I've worked on.
I think about all the things we could have done, all the miracles we could have achieved, if we were all just a little bit better than it turns out we are.
--Naomi Nagata
User avatar
DCIV
Posts: 26645
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:14 am
Location: TN

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by DCIV »

Think they will ever make small blue tooth controllers at one end and one at the other and get rid of the wiring inbeween?


Coop
[quote=""Melis""]The cop asked Coop "Are you really a firefighter?" Coop was like "yeah" then the cop said "ok your in charge" then the cop left :lol:
[/quote]

DCIV: first to 2,000,000 rep points :)
User avatar
Jeff V.
Posts: 25380
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:36 pm

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Jeff V. »

Never. There's way too much potential for interference and data loss.

CAN bus (and a half dozen other network technologies) was supposed to solve all of this mess. Run power, data and ground to a module and then the module controls everything close to it. Your harness should be at most 4 wires for most functions. But that didn't happen for some reason. The amplifier is a good example. It's already on the CAN bus. Why does it need a separate enable wire? The rear doors are another good one. They didn't bother to put a control module in the rear doors, so there's a ton of wires running up to the driver's door and the BCM for lock and window control.

I'm sure it all comes down to cost. For as much as they complain about the weight and complexity of the wiring harness, it's still cheaper than putting local control modules everywhere.
I think about all the things we could have done, all the miracles we could have achieved, if we were all just a little bit better than it turns out we are.
--Naomi Nagata
User avatar
aaronatstate
Posts: 9850
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by aaronatstate »

Some wire and a connector are much cheaper than more modules I would assume. Also I still think it makes send to have modules control everything in the car like the BCM does versus having more modules that control multiple things in an area.
Image
Chr15t0ph3r85: YES
Chr15t0ph3r85: GOOO STATE
:)
User avatar
Chris GTO TT
Posts: 15883
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: Sacramento

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Chris GTO TT »

I know Tesla tried that with the cyber truck and basically wound up running CAT5 cable throughout the truck and had all sorts of issues still.
User avatar
Jeff V.
Posts: 25380
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:36 pm

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Jeff V. »

The Cybertruck had some interesting stuff under the skin. It's mostly 48 volt power and ethernet for data. Both have been done before, but they're pushing it forward. Tesla's engineers are pretty impressive, and since they don't have as much architectural baggage as other manufacturers, they can try something interesting stuff. It just seems to get all fucked up once Elon's ambien and wine fever dreams come into play.
I think about all the things we could have done, all the miracles we could have achieved, if we were all just a little bit better than it turns out we are.
--Naomi Nagata
User avatar
Chris GTO TT
Posts: 15883
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: Sacramento

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Chris GTO TT »

Yeah there's definitely and advantage there and as you mentioned the drawback too
User avatar
aaronatstate
Posts: 9850
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by aaronatstate »

I was once told by some engineers that if you want to move something between the frame rails it’s a million bucks minimum development cost. If you want to move a part of the frame itself, it’s a billion. I’d assume it’s not as drastic with harnesses, but my guess is they are all just iterations/revisions of current harnesses, and to develop completely new harnesses and software architecture would just simply cost too much on an established platform.
Image
Chr15t0ph3r85: YES
Chr15t0ph3r85: GOOO STATE
:)
User avatar
Chris GTO TT
Posts: 15883
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: Sacramento

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Chris GTO TT »

Yeah. I'm sure that's why Ford hasn't drastically changed the F-150 frame since at least 2009 maybe even earlier.
User avatar
Jeff V.
Posts: 25380
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:36 pm

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Jeff V. »

There are entire vehicle programs that don't cost a billion dollars, so I'm a bit skeptical of that number. But I'm sure it's still very costly to do.
I think about all the things we could have done, all the miracles we could have achieved, if we were all just a little bit better than it turns out we are.
--Naomi Nagata
User avatar
aaronatstate
Posts: 9850
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by aaronatstate »

He was probably exaggerating some for sure, but it’s crazy how long they’ll keep something to save money. Though at some point, some executive will probably say change the systems architecture and it will have to happen :lol:
Image
Chr15t0ph3r85: YES
Chr15t0ph3r85: GOOO STATE
:)
User avatar
Jeff V.
Posts: 25380
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:36 pm

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Jeff V. »

:D

Image

Wheel is in, paddles are working. Didn't hook up the heat function. It'd be a lot of work that I'd just throw in the trash when I do the dash swap next summer. So it can wait for now.

I'm super happy with how it came out.
I think about all the things we could have done, all the miracles we could have achieved, if we were all just a little bit better than it turns out we are.
--Naomi Nagata
User avatar
Chris GTO TT
Posts: 15883
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: Sacramento

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Chris GTO TT »

That looks great
User avatar
DCIV
Posts: 26645
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:14 am
Location: TN

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by DCIV »

Damn!!!


Coop
[quote=""Melis""]The cop asked Coop "Are you really a firefighter?" Coop was like "yeah" then the cop said "ok your in charge" then the cop left :lol:
[/quote]

DCIV: first to 2,000,000 rep points :)
User avatar
Chris GTO TT
Posts: 15883
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: Sacramento

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Chris GTO TT »

When you do the dash swap are you going to the auto climate control
User avatar
Jeff V.
Posts: 25380
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:36 pm

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Jeff V. »

I have an auto climate control panel, but it's pretty banged up. That's why I was asking you about how big the 21+ panel is. I really want one with the numbers, and the newer truck panel looks great. I'd also like to get the separate mix doors for the HVAC box, but I think that'll be way too much work. The Expedition has a plug and play panel with the numbers, but it's ugly and it has rear seat buttons that would annoy the crap out of me.
I think about all the things we could have done, all the miracles we could have achieved, if we were all just a little bit better than it turns out we are.
--Naomi Nagata
User avatar
Duck Vader
Posts: 18735
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:57 am

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Duck Vader »

I don't like the heated steering wheel on mine. First vehicle with it. Makes me feel uncomfortable holding the wheel. It's just not right. Lol
User avatar
Chris GTO TT
Posts: 15883
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: Sacramento

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Chris GTO TT »

Duck Vader wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:57 pm I don't like the heated steering wheel on mine. First vehicle with it. Makes me feel uncomfortable holding the wheel. It's just not right. Lol
Heated wheel is interesting. I'd almost never use it since I park in the garage and the coldest it gets here is 'only' in the 20s.
Jeff V. wrote: Sun Dec 22, 2024 6:49 pm I have an auto climate control panel, but it's pretty banged up. That's why I was asking you about how big the 21+ panel is. I really want one with the numbers, and the newer truck panel looks great. I'd also like to get the separate mix doors for the HVAC box, but I think that'll be way too much work. The Expedition has a plug and play panel with the numbers, but it's ugly and it has rear seat buttons that would annoy the crap out of me.
ah yeah it'd be nice to have. I still want the number on my dials but Ford jacked the price up from like $120 to $300
User avatar
aaronatstate
Posts: 9850
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by aaronatstate »

Heated steering wheel is the best comfort feature in my RS and the wife’s Explorer. Super nice when it’s below zero.
Image
Chr15t0ph3r85: YES
Chr15t0ph3r85: GOOO STATE
:)
User avatar
Duck Vader
Posts: 18735
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:57 am

Re: Let's try Ford now.

Post by Duck Vader »

I run hot so maybe that's why I don't like it. Barely use heated seats (usually off within 5 min) and I keep temp at 66 or lower year round in the vehicles. It's middle of winter, we keep house at 65 at night, and I just use a sheet and still get hot at night.
Post Reply