Analysis Paralysis
Moderator: Monochrome
- Chris GTO TT
- Posts: 15955
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
- Location: Sacramento
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""vr4""]With an LS7 swap
He hates Nissan.
Veloster still exists?[/quote]
I still live in CA and don't plan to move.
I don't hate Nissan, I don't trust them after my parents had to drop 6k to have the head gaskets replaced on their 80k M35S
He hates Nissan.
Veloster still exists?[/quote]
I still live in CA and don't plan to move.
I don't hate Nissan, I don't trust them after my parents had to drop 6k to have the head gaskets replaced on their 80k M35S
- Chris GTO TT
- Posts: 15955
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
- Location: Sacramento
Re: Analysis Paralysis
Also for whatever reason I find I prefer sport sedans or wagons, so I'm not super interested in another 2 door car.
Re: Analysis Paralysis
Sell everything and buy a Raptor.
I think about all the things we could have done, all the miracles we could have achieved, if we were all just a little bit better than it turns out we are.
--Naomi Nagata
--Naomi Nagata
- Chris GTO TT
- Posts: 15955
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
- Location: Sacramento
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""Jeff V.""]Sell everything and buy a Raptor.[/quote]
Have zero need for a vehicle of its capabilities, but damnit it'd be awesome to have
Have zero need for a vehicle of its capabilities, but damnit it'd be awesome to have
Re: Analysis Paralysis
I dunno. It fits what you're describing.
It's fast.
It's capable.
It'd be fun to troll people at autocross.
It's fast.
It's capable.
It'd be fun to troll people at autocross.
I think about all the things we could have done, all the miracles we could have achieved, if we were all just a little bit better than it turns out we are.
--Naomi Nagata
--Naomi Nagata
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""Chris GTO TT""]I still live in CA and don't plan to move.
I don't hate Nissan, I don't trust them after my parents had to drop 6k to have the head gaskets replaced on their 80k M35S[/quote]
Gm car to gm car. The swap should be smog legal
I don't hate Nissan, I don't trust them after my parents had to drop 6k to have the head gaskets replaced on their 80k M35S[/quote]
Gm car to gm car. The swap should be smog legal
DOGE
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""Jeff V.""]I dunno. It fits what you're describing.
It's fast.
It's capable.
It'd be fun to troll people at autocross.[/quote]
The 6.2L in the older Raptors suck. Its slow compared to the 5.0L V8 and the 3.5L Turbo V6. That truck is only marginally better for off-road use, which he isnt going to do much anyways.
It's fast.
It's capable.
It'd be fun to troll people at autocross.[/quote]
The 6.2L in the older Raptors suck. Its slow compared to the 5.0L V8 and the 3.5L Turbo V6. That truck is only marginally better for off-road use, which he isnt going to do much anyways.

- Chris GTO TT
- Posts: 15955
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
- Location: Sacramento
Re: Analysis Paralysis
I always heard the 6.2 was a beast, a thirsty beast. It's the old 5.4 Raptors that blow.
- Chris GTO TT
- Posts: 15955
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
- Location: Sacramento
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""vr4""]Gm car to gm car. The swap should be smog legal[/quote]
There's more to it than that. It has to be the same year or newer and you have to carry over all emissions systems or some shit. Cars like Subarus where they are basically Legos its pretty easy to get a BAR'd swap (aka completely somg legal) others it's a bit more difficult.
There's more to it than that. It has to be the same year or newer and you have to carry over all emissions systems or some shit. Cars like Subarus where they are basically Legos its pretty easy to get a BAR'd swap (aka completely somg legal) others it's a bit more difficult.
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""Chris GTO TT""]I always heard the 6.2 was a beast, a thirsty beast. It's the old 5.4 Raptors that blow.[/quote]
6.2 blows. Its full of old tech and guzzles all your fuel. Look into the 5.0L if you want long term reliability with minimal work done to the truck. The 3.5L is quicker out of the box and obviously can take mods, but they can be temperamental with plugs, coils, etc. and will require servicing the turbos down the line.
Just depends on what you are most comfortable with.
6.2 blows. Its full of old tech and guzzles all your fuel. Look into the 5.0L if you want long term reliability with minimal work done to the truck. The 3.5L is quicker out of the box and obviously can take mods, but they can be temperamental with plugs, coils, etc. and will require servicing the turbos down the line.
Just depends on what you are most comfortable with.

Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""Chris GTO TT""]There's more to it than that. It has to be the same year or newer and you have to carry over all emissions systems or some shit. Cars like Subarus where they are basically Legos its pretty easy to get a BAR'd swap (aka completely somg legal) others it's a bit more difficult.[/quote]
Yes I'm aware of that too.
Yes I'm aware of that too.
DOGE
- aaronatstate
- Posts: 9891
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:52 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""Jeff V.""]Sell everything and buy a Raptor.[/quote]
I was coming to post exactly this. I even looked them up last night haha
[quote=""ChargerX3""]The 6.2L in the older Raptors suck. Its slow compared to the 5.0L V8 and the 3.5L Turbo V6. That truck is only marginally better for off-road use, which he isnt going to do much anyways.[/quote]
Everything Ive always read about the first gen Raptor with the 6.2L has been great. Of course its not going to get good fuel economy but who cares. It can do 70mph on a desert course
And the new 3.5 Raptor gets 15/18 city/highway where the 6.2L was rated at 14/18. So its not like its that much worse.
I was coming to post exactly this. I even looked them up last night haha
[quote=""ChargerX3""]The 6.2L in the older Raptors suck. Its slow compared to the 5.0L V8 and the 3.5L Turbo V6. That truck is only marginally better for off-road use, which he isnt going to do much anyways.[/quote]
Everything Ive always read about the first gen Raptor with the 6.2L has been great. Of course its not going to get good fuel economy but who cares. It can do 70mph on a desert course

Chr15t0ph3r85: YES
Chr15t0ph3r85: GOOO STATE
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""aaronatstate""]I was coming to post exactly this. I even looked them up last night haha
Everything Ive always read about the first gen Raptor with the 6.2L has been great. Of course its not going to get good fuel economy but who cares. It can do 70mph on a desert course
And the new 3.5 Raptor gets 15/18 city/highway where the 6.2L was rated at 14/18. So its not like its that much worse.[/quote]
The 6.2L size is wasted. The 5.0L is just as fast if not possibly quicker. Better engine design all around.
[quote=""vr4""]The new one is night and day faster[/quote]
Bingo.
Everything Ive always read about the first gen Raptor with the 6.2L has been great. Of course its not going to get good fuel economy but who cares. It can do 70mph on a desert course
The 6.2L size is wasted. The 5.0L is just as fast if not possibly quicker. Better engine design all around.
[quote=""vr4""]The new one is night and day faster[/quote]
Bingo.

- aaronatstate
- Posts: 9891
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:52 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""ChargerX3""]The 6.2L size is wasted. The 5.0L is just as fast if not possibly quicker. Better engine design all around.
Bingo.[/quote]
Itll still do 70 off road :d ontknow: I dont think you buy that type of truck to be fast on the road anyway. My point was the old ones dont get any worse mileage than the new ones. Even if they are slower. You can also get an older 6.2L in Chris price range.
Bingo.[/quote]
Itll still do 70 off road :d ontknow: I dont think you buy that type of truck to be fast on the road anyway. My point was the old ones dont get any worse mileage than the new ones. Even if they are slower. You can also get an older 6.2L in Chris price range.

Chr15t0ph3r85: YES
Chr15t0ph3r85: GOOO STATE
- Chris GTO TT
- Posts: 15955
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:50 pm
- Location: Sacramento
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""ChargerX3""]The 6.2L size is wasted. The 5.0L is just as fast if not possibly quicker. Better engine design all around.
Bingo.[/quote]
The 6.2 has significantly more power and torque than the 5.0 prior to the recent updates to the 5.0.
Either way the discussion is kind of pointless as 100k beat Raptors are at the very top of my price range. Ones in the condition and mileage I'd want are 40k-50k.
Bingo.[/quote]
The 6.2 has significantly more power and torque than the 5.0 prior to the recent updates to the 5.0.
Either way the discussion is kind of pointless as 100k beat Raptors are at the very top of my price range. Ones in the condition and mileage I'd want are 40k-50k.
- aaronatstate
- Posts: 9891
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:52 pm
- Location: Arkansas
- aaronatstate
- Posts: 9891
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:52 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: Analysis Paralysis
So can we summarize what you want in a vehicle...
Sounds like you need to pick up a fun car to replace both and rent a truck when you need to tow something :d ontknow:
- Fun to daily drive
- Decently quick
- Good on gas
- Can be taken to the track
- 4x4/AWD
- Has the ability to tow
- Comfortable
- Room for stuff
- Decent options
- Not break the bank expensive
- Reliable
Sounds like you need to pick up a fun car to replace both and rent a truck when you need to tow something :d ontknow:

Chr15t0ph3r85: YES
Chr15t0ph3r85: GOOO STATE
Re: Analysis Paralysis
Cayenne turbo hits all those points (hell even the na v8 is fairly quick) except the good on gas and arguably the reliable part (it is German after all but many say it's one of the most reliable out of Germany)
DOGE
Re: Analysis Paralysis
[quote=""Chris GTO TT""]The 6.2 has significantly more power and torque than the 5.0 prior to the recent updates to the 5.0.
Either way the discussion is kind of pointless as 100k beat Raptors are at the very top of my price range. Ones in the condition and mileage I'd want are 40k-50k.[/quote]
It can have more power on paper but a f150 with the 5.0 is just as quick in a straight line. I also think the gas mileage comparison is off. I got great mileage with my work truck. My current truck has the 6.2 in it and its all sorts of let downs.
I like your loaded fx4 more. Much better buy imo.
Either way the discussion is kind of pointless as 100k beat Raptors are at the very top of my price range. Ones in the condition and mileage I'd want are 40k-50k.[/quote]
It can have more power on paper but a f150 with the 5.0 is just as quick in a straight line. I also think the gas mileage comparison is off. I got great mileage with my work truck. My current truck has the 6.2 in it and its all sorts of let downs.
I like your loaded fx4 more. Much better buy imo.
